Agriculture and Natural Resources 08/26/2011
Energy
SB 226 (Simitian) – Concerns
As Amended August 17, 2011
SB 226, by Senator Joe Simitian, passed out of the Assembly
Agriculture Committee this week. This bill would provide CEQA
exemption for projects consisting of the installation of solar
energy system on the roof of an existing building meeting
specified conditions. This bill would also require the Secretary
of the Natural Resources Agency, on or before March 1, 2012, to
adopt a categorical exemption for solar photovoltaic projects
located on disturbed agricultural lands meeting specified
conditions, until January 1, 2015. The bill also amends the SB
375 CEQA streamlining measures. CSAC expressed our particular
concerns in Committee this week with the portion of the bill
dealing with the categorical exemption for solar photovoltaic
projects located on disturbed agricultural lands.
Specifically, SB 226 creates a limit on the agricultural land
that qualifies for the exemption (previously used for
agricultural production for at least five years that have been
mechanically disturbed or converted from native vegetation
through plowing, bulldozing, or other similar means) and
eliminates important prime agricultural lands. While we support
the bill’s inclusion of limitations to protect important
agricultural lands, the language is not clear as to what would
qualify under the exemption. CSAC urged the author to provide
additional clarification to the lands that would qualify under
this section. In addition, CSAC supported the American Planning
Association’s suggested amendments related to late comments. For
more information on this portion of the bill, see the HLT
section.
SB 136 (Yee) – Oppose
As Amended August 22, 2011
SB 136, by Senator Leland Yee, would expand the definition of
‘public works’ to include work done under private contract in
connection with the construction or maintenance of renewable
energy generating capacity or energy efficiency improvements for
the purposes of prevailing wage requirements. This bill would
mandate private companies to pay prevailing wage for their
renewable energy generation and efficiency work performed on
state or local property.
CSAC, along with other local government groups, is opposed to
this bill because are concerned that it would set a new
precedent, opening up prevailing wage requirements to a host of
new services by stating in section 1720.6 (a) “work performed in
connection with construction or maintenance of renewable energy…”
Local governments across the state are conducting energy audits,
attempting to identify cost-saving and greenhouse gas reduction
measures in their respective jurisdictions. By opening up these
types of activities to prevailing wage requirements many of the
cost savings generated by these programs would be consumed by
these new requirements. This bill is on the Senate Third Reading
File.
Mining
AB 742 (Lowenthal) – Oppose
As Amended August 16, 2011
AB 742, by Assembly Member Bonnie Lowenthal, passed out of the
Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee this week. This bill
would prohibit a lead agency from approving a reclamation plan
for an aggregate products operation if the operation is located
on or within 2,000 yards of the external boundaries of an Indian
reservation and is on or within 5,000 yards of a Native American
sacred site, and is on or within 4,000 yards of the Santa
Margarita River or an aquifer that is hydrologically connected to
the river, unless the tribe whose reservation is nearest the
operation consents to the operation. CSAC is opposed to this bill
because we believe that it sets a dangerous precedent. CSAC
believes that the existing permitting process is the appropriate
channel for this debate to occur. Overriding existing laws and
regulations related to siting of an aggregate mining operation
would jeopardize the process the Legislature created exactly for
this purpose. This bill has been referred to the Rules Committee.
Solid Waste
AB 341 (Chesbro) – Oppose Unless Amended
As Amended July 7, 2011
AB 341, by Assembly Member Wes Chesbro, passed off the Senate
Appropriations Suspense File yesterday. As amended on July 7th,
this bill would require the Department of Resources, Recycling
and Recovery (CAL Recycle) to “ensure” that 75 percent of solid
waste is diverted from landfills, and would require commercial
and multi-family recycling. However, the bill prohibits the
Department from imposing any enforceable requirements on cities
or counties. It appears that the author will be accepting
amendments to turn the 75% diversion provision into a statewide
goal. This amendment seems to mirror language included in AB
737from last year. CSAC was actively involved in the negotiations
around last year’s version of this bill, AB 737 and supported the
final draft that would have required CAL Recycle to develop
strategies to meet the 75 percent goal, rather than “ensure” that
75 percent is achieved. Once amendments are in print, CSAC will
reevaluate our position on the bill.
SB 833 (Vargas) – Oppose
As Amended April 25, 2011
SB 833, by Assembly Member Juan Vargas, passed off the Assembly
Suspense File this week. This bill would place specific
restrictions on the construction of solid waste facilities in San
Diego County. Specifically, SB 833 prohibits a person from
constructing a solid waste facility in San Diego County if it is
within 1,000 feet of the San Luis Rey River, or within 1,000 feet
of a site that is considered to be sacred land to a Native
American tribe. CSAC is opposed to this bill because it would
establish a dangerous precedent when dealing with the siting and
permitting of solid waste facilities. CSAC believes that the
existing permitting process is the appropriate channel for this
debate to occur.
Overriding existing laws and regulations related to the siting
and construction of a solid waste facility would jeopardize the
process the Legislature created exactly for this purpose.