Agriculture and Natural Resources 11/23/2010
2010 Annual Meeting Recap
Agriculture and Natural Resources Policy Committee Summary
Following opening remarks and introductions by Vice Chair
Supervisor Richard Forster, the CSAC Agriculture and Natural
Resources Committee kicked off their meeting in Riverside with a
2010 Budget/Legislative Wrap-up. While most of this report
focused on the Williamson Act, CSAC staff also provided
information regarding the new Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR)
fee by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) on
operating solid waste landfills, and extended producer
responsibility (EPR) bills signed by the Governor.
The committee’s brief discussion and approval of proposed changes
to the CSAC Platform was followed by a presentation on the
Planning and Conservation League’s (PCL) Water Neutral
Initiative. The speaker, Evon Chambers, PCL’s Water Policy and
Planning Analyst, explained that this endeavor promotes water
neutral development as an innovative solution that allows new
developments to offset their water demand. Under a “water
neutral” development model, a developer commits to on-site water
conservation/recycling to minimize demand by the development, and
then contributes to a demand mitigation fund. These funds in turn
are invested in various water efficiency technologies and
programs.
The introduction of water neutral developments to the committee
was followed by a discussion of one county’s experience in coping
with a large water project. Butte County Supervisors Bill
Connelly and Steve Lambert talked about the failure of the
Department of Water Resources to mitigate the impacts of the
Oroville Dam on the county and surrounding communities. According
to the information presented, promises of jobs, low cost energy,
and tourism, to name a few, never materialized. Instead, the
county has experienced an overall economic loss that equals over
$12 million annually as a result of this project. In conclusion,
the supervisors indicated their commitment to seeking a just
result for the taxpayers of Butte County.
The committee’s final agenda item was a brief update by CSAC
staff regarding the requirements for automatic fire sprinkler
systems in all new one- and two-family residences, effective
January 1, 2011. Recently released information regarding the use
of antifreeze within these systems was also shared with the
committee.
The PCL and Butte County Power Point presentations and fire
sprinkler background materials are available on the CSAC
website’s advocacy page under the Agriculture and Natural
Resources section.
California Counties and Water: A Roundtable
Discussion
Tuesday afternoon’s water roundtable was well attended and well
received. This informal session, facilitated by Yolo County
Supervisor Mike McGowan and Tulare County Supervisor Alan Ishida,
began with an overview of CSAC’s existing water policy and past
actions on various water bonds and pertinent water legislation.
The roundtable dialog among the county participants included a
report from Siskiyou County Supervisor Jim Cook alerting counties
to the Department of Fish and Game’s (DFG) recent
reinterpretation of Fish and Game Code Section 1602. According to
Supervisor Cook, agricultural water diverters in the Scott and
Shasta River watersheds were notified earlier this year that they
would have to obtain a lake or streambed alteration agreement in
order to exercise water rights. In response, the California Farm
Bureau Federation filed a request for declaratory relief which is
currently pending before the San Francisco Superior Court. Given
the precedent setting nature of this action by DFG, counties are
encouraged to review the background materials posted on the CSAC
webpage under the Agriculture and Natural Resources
section.
The roundtable was followed by a report from Solano County
Supervisor Mike Reagan notifying counties to impending actions by
the State involving the Delta, including the release of the Bay
Delta Conservation Plan. Supervisor Reagan noted concerns with
the plan’s potential impacts on agriculture given the significant
amount of land that will be set aside for habitat. Frustration
was also expressed regarding the State’s failure to adequately
consider local authority or mitigation of impacts on the Delta
region. The roundtable participants echoed similar frustration
with the State agency decision-making process and its lack of
consideration for local impacts
Given the participants’ enthusiasm with the dialog that took
place, CSAC will work with the roundtable facilitators and the
chair and vice chair of the CSAC Agriculture and Natural
Resources Committee in planning future water roundtables.
Counties Discuss Medical Marijuana
Over 70 county supervisors and staff gathered last week for the
CSAC Medical Marijuana workshop in Riverside, CA. The workshop
featured three panel speakers from Mendocino, Tehama and Los
Angeles Counties. The panelists focused on the various medical
marijuana issues their respective communities have encountered
since the passage of Proposition 215 in 1996. Sari Steel, Deputy
County Counsel from Los Angeles County focused on Los Angeles
County’s efforts to regulate medical marijuana dispensaries
through their ordinances and code enforcement, while Supervisor
Bob Williams from Tehama County and Jeanine Nadel, Mendocino
County Counsel focused their remarks on the issue of regulating
and controlling medical marijuana cultivation.
Supervisors Mark Lovelace and Susan Adams, also the co-chairs of
the CSAC Medical Marijuana Working Group, moderated the hour-long
discussion that followed. Issues were raised regarding county
ordinances and the different methods that counties have employed
to regulate the cultivation and use of medical marijuana, as well
as issues regarding data collection, the transport of medical
marijuana, federal government involvement, among other
things.
The CSAC Medical Marijuana Working Group will meet again in the
beginning of 2011