Employee Relations 02/01/2013
Federal Immigration Reform Framework Released; Contains Employment Proposals
In a bipartisan effort to reform the federal immigration process, Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY), John McCain (R-AZ), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Lindsay Graham (R-SC), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Michael Bennet (D-CO), and Jeffrey Flake (R-AZ) released a framework for comprehensive reform they say will streamline and modernize the system. The group stated its intention to introduce actual legislation in the next couple of weeks. Among the “Four Basic Legislative Pillars,” which include creating a fair path to citizenship that is contingent upon securing United States borders and tracking whether legal immigrants have left the country when required, the reform calls for:
- Stronger employment verification, including fines and criminal penalties for employers that knowingly hire illegal immigrants and the creation of an effective employment verification system, and
- The protection of workers’ rights by ensuring strong labor protections and providing employers with the ability to hire lower-skilled workers in a timely manner.
CSAC will keep counties apprised of the introduction of legislation when it occurs.
CSAC Makes IRS Ruling Regarding Employee Pension Contributions a Federal Advocacy Priority
Last week in The CSAC Bulletin, we highlighted the
re-introduction of legislation by United States Congresswoman
Loretta Sanchez (CA-46) that would revise an Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) Ruling and thereby allow the implementation of
Orange County’s hybrid pension plan. That plan, first adopted in
2010, allows new hires to choose between its current pension
formula and a lower benefit formula that is combined with a
401K-style defined contribution plan, with the county matching
those contributions up to six percent. Existing employees are
currently unable to opt-in to the hybrid plan due to IRS Ruling
2006-43.
Under IRS ruling 2006-43,Orange County’s optional defined benefit
plan tier for current employees could be seen as a cash or
deferred arrangement (prohibited under IRC 414(h)(2)) as it
changes the amount of the contribution picked up by the employer.
As a result, allowing their current employees to elect the lower
pension benefit formula may force all of Orange County’s
employees to pay taxes on their retirement deductions.
The rising cost of public employee pension plans remains a
concern for all of California’s counties. A number of counties
have proposed their own local solutions, such as allowing current
employees to elect lower pension benefits with lower retirement
contributions, but Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules are an
obstacle to these reforms. As such, CSAC deemed it necessary to
actively advocate at the federal level for passage of legislation
that would revise the IRS ruling so that local governments can
propose and implement their own local plans, without severe
consequences. We would like to hear from counties that desire to
weigh in on issues related to the IRS ruling and/or are
interested in individually supporting the legislation.