Employee Relations 03/01/2013
Workers’ Compensation
SB 809 (DeSaulnier) – Request for Comment
As Introduced on February 22, 2013
Senate Bill 809, by Senator Mark DeSaulnier, would create the
CURES Fund (Fund) within the State Treasury and require licensed
health practitioners and pharmacists, prior to providing patients
with Schedule II, III, or IV controlled substances, to access
information regarding a patient’s history of controlled substance
prescriptions. The bill is aimed at curbing workers’ compensation
claimants’ misuse and abuse of prescribed opioids, an increasing
concern to, and cost for, employers.
The Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System
(CURES), maintained by the Department of Justice (DOJ), is an
electronic monitoring system of Schedule II, III, and IV
controlled substances and provides for the electronic
transmission of those controlled substance prescriptions data to
the DOJ when they are dispensed. The purpose of creating CURES
was to assist law enforcement in controlling the abuse of these
drugs. When a pharmacist fills a prescription for a Schedule II,
III, or IV drug, current law requires him or her to provide DOJ
with the name, prescribing physician’s name, quantity and the
form of the drug.
SB 809 would require health practitioners that prescribe or
dispense controlled substances and certain drug wholesalers to
pay increased licensing, certification and renewal fees to the
CURES Fund. The bill would also require qualified manufactures
(those making controlled substances and doing business in
California) and health insurers, workers’ compensation licensed
insurers and health care service plans to pay an annual tax that
would be administered by the State Board of Equalization and
deposited into the Fund.
SB 809 is currently awaiting assignment to a policy
committee.
SB 626 (Beall) – Oppose
As Introduced on February 22, 2013
Senate Bill 626, by Senator Jim Beall, would roll back several of
the workers’ compensation system reforms achieved in last year’s
SB 863 (Chapter 363, Statutes of 2012). Counties will recall the
CSAC-supported workers’ compensation reform measure that, among
other things, increased permanent disability benefits to injured
workers while making necessary administrative and procedural
changes within the system.
SB 626 would:
- Permit chiropractors to serve as Primary Treating Physicians beyond the 24 chiropractic visit cap.
- Allows the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board to overrule decisions made by an Independent Medical Review (IMR).
- Requires utilization review and IMR physicians reviewing treatment requests to hold the same type of license as the requesting physician (for example, an orthopedic surgeon would not be able to review a chiropractor’s request, only a chiropractor could do so).
- Permits an increase in permanent disability ratings for psychological injuries that arise out of a physical injury.
- Eliminates the confidentiality of IMR reviewers.
CSAC was part of a coalition of management and labor that worked
closely with Governor Brown to ensure that the reform included
fair benefits to injured employees, but also contained provisions
that reduced administrative burdens on and costs to employers. SB
626 undermines last year’s collaborative effort.
This bill is awaiting assignment to a policy committee.
SB 146 (Lara) – Watch
As Introduced on January 31, 2013
Senate Bill 146, by Senator Ricardo Lara, is a bill intended to
provide technical clean-up for last year’s workers’ compensation
reform legislation.
Included in SB 863 was a requirement that the medical billing
process, specifically that service providers (including
physicians, hospitals, pharmacies, interpreters, copy services,
transportation services and home health care services) must
include the prescription or referral from the primary treating
physician in a request for payment of a workers’ compensation
pharmacy claim if the services were performed by a person other
than the primary treating physician.
Accordingly, the Division of Workers’ Compensation adopted a new
electronic billing standard for pharmacy bills – however, that
standard does not currently support the inclusion of attachments
(i.e., a prescription). Approval of a claim is at risk if lack of
compliance with the inclusion of the prescription deems a bill
incomplete, to avoid unnecessarily denied claims, SB 146 proposes
to remove the requirement to include a copy of the prescription
and give pharmacy providers the ability to re-bill for any claims
denied for not including a copy until a correction can be
implemented into law.
SB 146 will be heard in the Senate Labor and Industrial Relations
Committee on March 13, 2013.