Employee Relations 03/02/2012
Pension Conference Committee Holds Fourth Hearing
The Conference Committee on Public Employee Pensions held its
fourth meeting on Tuesday in Sacramento to examine the impact of
Governor Brown’s proposal to increase the normal retirement age
for public employees.
Counties will recall that AB 340, by Assembly Member Warren
Furutani, was amended last September to state legislative intent
to convene a conference committee for the purpose of crafting
comprehensive pension reform legislation. The Committee is made
up of Assembly Members Michael Allen, Warren Furutani (Chair) and
Beth Gaines and Senators Gloria Negrete-McLeod, Joseph Simitian
and Mimi Walters, first met on October 26 in an informational
hearing to address the current condition of public employee
benefits and reform efforts. The Committee met again in another
informational hearing on December 1 to discuss in detail Governor
Brown’s pension reform plan and in January to review
Governor Brown’s proposal to create a mandatory hybrid pension
plan for new employees.
The Committee heard testimony from Ron Snell, from the National
Conference of State Legislatures, who provided information on
other states that had increased normal retirement ages; Ann
Boynton from the California Public Employees’ Retirement System
(CalPERS) opined that raising retirement ages could reduce
overall savings for new members and would impact healthcare
premiums in the CalPERS pool since members would use the CalPERS
plan in place of Medicare; Ed Derman of the California State
Teachers’ Retirement System provided feedback from the
perspective of that retirement system, stating that raising
retirement ages could cause a decrease in benefits and a
significant reduction in the standard of living; finally, the
Chair of the UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research discussed how
raising retirement ages would disproportionately affect members
of different races, income and educational level.
CSAC will keep you apprised of the Committee’s further actions.
Workers’ Compensation
AB 1845 (Solorio) – Request for Comment
As Introduced February 22, 2012
Assembly Bill 1845, by Assembly Member Jose Solorio, would
require that assessments for overpaid unemployment compensation
benefits be deposited into both the Benefit Audit Fund and the
Unemployment Fund. Current law requires unemployment compensation
benefits that have been overpaid because the individual receiving
the benefits either made a false statement or representation or
withheld facts be deposited into the Benefit Audit Fund. The
employer is then reimbursed from the Benefit Audit Fund.
AB 1845 would instead require the overpaid benefit assessments be
deposited as follows: 50 percent into the Benefit Audit Fund and
50 percent into the Unemployment Insurance Fund.
AB 1845 is currently awaiting assignment to a policy committee.
Employment
AB 1740 (Perez, V.) – Request for Comment
As Introduced February 17, 2012
Assembly Bill 1740, by Assembly Member V. Manuel Perez, would
expand California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), which
currently prohibits employers from denying an individual’s right
to seek, obtain and hold employment based on race, religious
creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability,
mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex,
gender, gender identity, age or sexual orientation.
AB 1740 would expand the bases on which such discrimination is
prohibited under FEHA to include a person’s status as a victim of
domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking. The bill further
expands what reasonable accommodations an employer must make for
such victims, including transfer, reassignment, a modified
schedule, changed work station and/or telephone, and assistance
in documenting domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking.
AB 1740 is currently awaiting assignment to a policy
committee.
AB 1999 (Brownley) – Request for Comment
As introduced February 23, 2012
Assembly Bill 1999, by Assembly Member Julia Brownley, also seeks
to expand California’s FEHA by including “familial status” as a
basis upon which an employer cannot discriminate with regard to
the individual’s right to seek, obtain and hold employment.
The bill defines “familial status” as being an individual who is,
will be or perceived to be a family caregiver and specifies
family as: a child, parent, spouse, domestic partner,
parent-in-law, sibling, grandparent, or grandchild.
AB 1999 is awaiting assignment to a policy committee.
AB 1844 (Campos) – Request for Comment
As introduced February 22, 2012
Assembly Bill 1844, by Assembly Member Nora Campos, would provide
that if an employer has not searched or monitored the social
media of a potential employee to determine if he or she is unfit
or incompetent, that employer has not engaged in negligent
hiring. Negligent hiring is defined in statute as when an
employer brings in a new employee without exercising reasonable
care in hiring the worker to discover whether he or she was unfit
or incompetent and the employee causes harm to a second employee.
AB 1844 also would prohibit an employer from requiring an
employee or prospective employee to disclose a user name or
account password to his or her social media site.
AB 1844 is currently awaiting assignment to a policy committee.