Employee Relations 03/09/2012
CalPERS Committee to Review Discount Rate
The Pension and Health Benefits Committee of the California
Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) next week will
consider changes to the 7.75 percent discount rate currently used
for actuarial valuations. Actuarial valuations are performed
annually to determine plan liabilities and the contribution rates
necessary to adequately fund them.
The discount rate used by CalPERS was last reviewed in March 2011
when the CalPERS Board of Administration (Board) voted to keep
the discount rate at 7.75 percent; CalPERS’ Chief Actuary, Alan
Milligan, is recommending the Board at its March 14 meeting adopt
a lower discount rate of 7.25 percent for actuarial valuations
dated June 30, 2011 and beyond. The impact of lowering the
discount rate to 7.5 percent for miscellaneous plans would be a
3.2 to 4.5 percent increase in employer payroll; for safety
plans, the increase would range from five to 6.6 percent.
Click
here to read the full CalPERS analysis of the
recommendation.
Veterans’ Benefits
AB 1592 (Olsen) – Support
As Introduced on February 6, 2012
Assembly Bill 1592, by Assembly Member Kristin Olsen, would
authorize the governing board of any county or city to grant
financial assistance, relief, and support to disabled veterans by
waiving service-related fees, including building and inspection
fees, charged by the county or city.
It is CSAC’s understanding that the author’s intention for the
bill is to allow governing boards of counties and cities to waive
building and inspection permit fees for Americans With
Disabilities Act (ADA) modifications to homes that are owned by
veterans with service-related disabilities. AB 1592 will be heard
in the Assembly Local Government Committee on March 21.
Employees’ Rights
AB 1831 (Dickinson) – Request for Comment
As Introduced on February 22, 2012
Assembly Bill 1831, by Assembly Member Roger Dickinson, would
prohibit local agencies from inquiring into the criminal history
of an applicant on any initial employment application (unless the
position is one for which a criminal history background check is
already required by law). Local agencies would, however, retain
the ability to consider the applicant’s criminal history once the
agency has determined he or she meets the minimum employment
requirements.
AB 1831 is part of the “Ban the Box” movement in which states,
cities and counties across the country have ended inquiring into
an applicant’s criminal history on the initial job application in
an effort to reduce ruling out the criminally convicted
population. The language in AB 1831 also references the Criminal
Justice Realignment Act (AB 109) and its focus on reducing
recidivism and promoting rehabilitation of offenders and their
re-entry into the workforce.
AB 1831 will be heard in the Assembly Local Government Committee
on April 11.