Employee Relations 07/27/2012
Budget Trailer Bill Allows Department of Fair Employment and Housing to File Lawsuits in Discrimination Cases
Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 1038 (Chapter 46, Statutes of
2012) last month, a bill that mostly implemented
his state
agency reorganization plan. However, the bill was amended on
June 25 (and signed on June 27) and contains an expansion of
authority for the Department of Fair Employment and Housing
(Department), essentially allowing the Department to bring civil
actions to state and federal trial courts on behalf of allegedly
aggrieved employees.
The bill eradicates the Department’s sister agency, the Fair
Employment and Housing Commission (Commission), and instead
creates the Fair Employment and Housing Council under the
Department, transferring many of the Commission’s regulatory
responsibilities to the Department. More importantly, SB 1038
expands the Department’s powers regarding discrimination
complaints under the Fair Employment and Housing Act
(FEHA).
Current Law. Currently, and until January 1,
2013, the Department mainly processes FEHA complaints internally.
When an aggrieved party files a complaint with the Department,
the party may either have the complaint investigated by the
Department or request a right-to-sue document – if the aggrieved
party proceeds with his or her complaint in the court, the
Department is no longer involved in the investigation of the
matter. Should the complainant move forward with the Department’s
administrative process, the Department starts an investigation
and can issue subpoenas, serve written interrogatories, depose
witnesses and file petitions with a superior court to get an
order compelling a witness or organization to comply with
subpoenas, interrogatories, requests for production of documents
or exam under oath. If after the investigation, the Department
determines there has been a violation under FEHA, the Department,
after offering voluntary mediation, settlement negotiations and
conciliation conferences, can file an accusation with the
Commission and the respondent has a right to a hearing within 90
days of the accusation filing. If no settlement is reached or if
the respondent does not request that the matter be transferred to
a court, the Department will prosecute the accusation before an
administrative law judge employed by the Commission.
New Process. After January 1, 2013, the
administrative process outlined above within the Department will
no longer exist; once an aggrieved party files a claim with the
Department, the Department, if it determines an unlawful action
has occurred under FEHA, must require parties to participate in
mandatory dispute resolution, free of charge to the parties and
within the Department’s internal dispute resolution division, in
an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation. However, if
the unlawful action is not eliminated through conference,
conciliation, mediation or persuasion, the Department can now
bring a civil action in the name of the Department on behalf of
the complainant.
It should be noted that removing the administrative accusation
process from current law also eliminated the $150,000 cap on
actual damages that can be assessed against the respondent for
unlawful practice. When cases are litigated in a civil court, the
employee may recover unlimited monetary damages, including back
pay, emotional distress damages, punitive damages, any other
out-of-pocket losses and attorney’s fees and costs.