Employee Relations 09/04/2012
ADA Bill Would Place Fee on Business License Applications
SB 1186, by Senators Darrell Steinberg and Bob Dutton, addresses
disability access issues and will significantly change state
rules on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuits. Among
other things, SB 1186 will reduce minimum damages for ADA
violations if the defendant hired a Certified Access Specialist
(CASp) and prevent the stacking of multiple claims of ADA
violation to increase statutory damages.
While SB 1186 mainly addresses compliance and litigation issues
with respect to ADA, of importance to counties is a small aspect
of the bill that would place a one-dollar fee on all
business license applications and renewals for the purpose of
funding an increase in the number of CASp in local building
departments and funding educational and training resources
at the state and local level to promote ADA compliance.
The monies collected from the fees would be split – 70 percent to
the local agency and 30 percent to the Division of the State
Architect (DSA). Local public entities would be able to use five
percent for administration costs and the remainder will be used
to pay for hiring and training more CASp for local building
departments. Local agencies would be required to work with the
California Commission on Disability Access to gather, develop and
disseminate educational materials and information to facilitate
disability access compliance (those materials would be provided
by the state). Additionally, local agencies would be required to
make an annual report to the Legislature and Chairs of the Senate
and Assembly Judiciary Committees as well as the Chair of the
Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review regarding the total
fees that had been collected in the previous calendar years and
their distribution.
SB 1186 is awaiting action by the Governor.
Workers’ Compensation
AB 808 (Skinner) - Oppose
Dead
AB 808, by Assembly Member Nancy Skinner, would have established
a presumption for workers’ compensation purposes when a hospital
employee contracts a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA) skin infection and extend this presumption 60 days after
the employee’s service has been terminated. AB 808 was similar to
AB 375, which was held on the Senate Floor last year.
CSAC opposed AB 808 because employers need to retain the
discretion to accept or challenge workers’ compensation claims.
Further, AB 808 could result in increased costs in workers’
compensation for county hospitals at a time when counties are
facing budget deficits and reduced funding for program services.
The system of workers’ compensation should provide appropriate
benefits to all injured workers who sustain a work-related injury
or illness. Under current workers’ compensation law, the employee
must show that there is a nexus between work and the injury or
illness – AB 808 would prohibit employers from attributing an
employee’s contraction of MRSA to any skin infection or disease
that existed prior to the contraction or development of the
disease, creating a further insurmountable burden for the
employer to rebut a MRSA claim.
AB 808 died on the Senate Floor as it was not brought up for a
vote before the midnight deadline on August 31.
AB 2451 - Oppose
As Enrolled on August 28, 2012
AB 2451, by Assembly Speaker John A. Perez, would double the
statute of limitations for when a claim can be filed for death
benefits from 240 weeks to 480 for dependents of a firefighter or
peace officer who dies of certain occupational ailments. Those
ailments are: hernias, pneumonia, cancer, tuberculosis,
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and blood
borne infectious diseases
CSAC opposes AB 2451 as we believe that not only do liberal
standards for public safety officers already allow employees to
get fairly compensated on the basis of a disease presumption when
that injury is presumed to have job causation, but because the
provisions of AB 2451 continue to expand the statute of
limitations in which a beneficiary of a firefighter or peace
officer can file a claim for death benefits. Such an extension
depletes counties’ certainty as to ultimate expected benefit
costs, which, as a result of AB 2451, will inevitably rise at a
time when we are struggling to provide residents with basic
services on limited budgets. Additionally, the injuries covered
in AB 2451 do not have the same close connection to work
exposures as do asbestosis and HIV (already presumptive illnesses
in current law), making it nearly impossible for employers to
refute the claim.
AB 2451 is awaiting action by the Governor.
Public Safety
AB 2298 (Solorio) - Oppose
As Enrolled on August 30, 2012
AB 2298, by Assembly Member Jose Solorio, was amended late last
week with the language previously included in AB 1551 (now a bill
concerning the CalHome Program), and would therefore exempt
certain public safety officers from a requirement to report
accidents that occur in a personal vehicle to a personal
insurance provider unless it is determined that the employer did
not request or direct the employee to use his or her personal
vehicle.
If enacted, employers of public safety personnel will face
increased liability for employees who drive their personal
vehicles for work purposes which will increase employers’
insurance costs. CSAC opposes AB 2298 as we believe that
shifting the costs and liability for accidents involving personal
vehicles to public employers is inappropriate; the Internal
Revenue Service mileage reimbursement rate includes insurance
costs among the items for which it is intended to reimburse those
who drive their personal vehicles for work purposes.
Additionally, as local jurisdictions have negotiated policies to
address liability for accidents involving personal vehicles that
best reflect local priorities and circumstances, it is
unnecessary to impose a statewide, one-size-fits-all solution to
a perceived problem.
AB 2298 is awaiting action by the Governor.