Government Finance and Operations 01/27/2012
Elections
AB 1413 (Fong) – Support
As Amended on January 5, 2012
AB 1413, by Assembly Member Paul Fong, would fix several issues
related to the statutory implementation of Proposition 14. In
doing so it would make future elections less expensive for
counties.
The bill that implemented the statutory provisions of Proposition
14, SB 6, went beyond the constitutional requirements by also
requiring particular language to be printed on every ballot and
next to each candidate’s name. The requirements are wordier than
necessary and at times specify extraordinary font sizes. Ballot
real estate is valuable, and these provisions will result in
significant costs to counties. Because these costs are mandated
by the state, the state would end up being responsible for
reimbursing counties.
AB 1413 makes a number of changes that will significantly reduce
these increased expenses. In particular, shortening the party
preference language next to each candidate’s name and removing
font size requirements for instructions printed on the ballot
will save money without noticeably affecting a voter’s
experience.
With the millions of dollars of recent state funding cuts for
elections, this relief is particularly welcome. AB 1413 is an
urgency bill, so it would go into effect immediately upon
receiving the Governor’s signature.
The Assembly Elections and Redistricting Committee unanimously
approved AB 1413 on Thursday, January 26. If all goes as planned,
the Assembly will pass the bill early next week and present the
bill to the Governor.
Local Revenue
AB 1191 (Huber) – Sponsor
As Amended on January 4, 2012
AB 1191, by Assembly Member Alyson Huber, provides counties and
their cities a process to seek reimbursement for revenues lost as
a result of the triple-flip and the VLF swap. CSAC and the
Regional Council of Rural Counties are jointly sponsoring the
bill.
These two accounting maneuvers were designed to reimburse
counties and cities for their losses related to the diversion of
a quarter cent of the local sales tax and the permanent reduction
of VLF to 0.65 percent. They work by transferring school property
tax revenue to counties and cities; the state then fills in
schools’ lost revenue pursuant to Proposition 98. School
districts that have their full Proposition 98 minimum guarantee
met by local property taxes are called “basic aid,” and the
triple-flip and VLF swap do not allow county auditors to divert
those districts’ property taxes.
Two counties, Amador and Mono, find themselves in a circumstance
unforeseen by the state or local governments in 2004: all of
their local school entities qualify as “basic aid.” This means
they have no source for their triple-flip and VLF swap.
AB 1191 outlines a process by which county auditors would be
required to present information to the State Controller that
identifies the amount of reimbursement owed to each local agency
for both the Flip and Swap. Once those amounts are appropriated
by the Legislature, the Controller then transfers the owed funds
to the county auditor for distribution to the affected county and
cities.
The Assembly passed AB 1191 with no ‘no’ votes on Thursday,
January 26. It now moves to the Senate.
Underpayment Penalties
AB 1289 (Davis) – Support
As Amended on January 12, 2012
AB 1289, by Assembly Member Mike Davis, would decrease the
penalty for underpayments from counties to the State Trial Court
Construction Fund. By changing the penalties so they are equal to
the annual returns in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), AB
1289 would make them the same as penalties for all other
underpayments. It would also make the state whole, since the LAIF
rate is what it would have earned on the underpaid funds. The
change would also be fairer to counties. Because the State
Controller only audits these payments from most counties every
five to seven years, the current high annual penalty rate results
in exorbitant penalties when not caught for a few years.
The most recent amendments authorize the Controller to allow the
county or city to pay the interest or penalty on a payment
schedule in cases of hardship.
The Assembly passed AB 1289 on its consent calendar on Thursday,
January 26. It now moves to the Senate.