Government Finance and Operations 03/15/2013
Budget Subcommittee to Consider Insufficient ERAF
Next Tuesday, March 19, Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 4 will
consider the Governor’s proposal to reimburse counties and cities
that would otherwise lose money under the state’s “Triple Flip”
and “VLF Swap” revenue shifts.
In one of those schemes, the state shifted local sales and use
taxes to secure a better interest rate for a bond. In the other,
the state significantly cut the VLF rate, the revenues of which
went only to counties and cities. In both, affected local
agencies got their reimbursement from the countywide ERAF. The
school districts that lose money due to this shift are completely
reimbursed by the state under Proposition 98, which guarantees
school districts minimum funding levels.
Recently, more school districts have begun to reach their
guaranteed funding level entirely with property taxes, no state
contribution required. Current statute disallows using property
tax revenues allocated to these districts to reimburse the Triple
Flip and VLF Swap, meaning that counties that experiencing this
situation have an insufficient source for reimbursement.
The budget proposal would provide the funding the affected local
agencies are entitled to. The same issue was proposed and
approved in the current year budget. CSAC supports the budget
allocation for counties experiencing insufficient ERAF to fully
fund their Triple Flip and VLF Swap amounts.
LAO: Fund Election Mandates
The Legislative Analyst’s Office recommended this
week that the Legislature reject the Governor’s proposal to
continue suspending election mandates. The mandates require
counties to provide services like voting by mail and checking
provisional ballot envelopes to make sure the signatures match
those of the voters.
Mandates become optional when the Legislature suspends them, and
the LAO argues, appropriately, that this threatens the uniformity
of elections. Their report gives the example of a senate district
that crosses county lines, and points out that if these counties
chose differently when deciding whether to continue performing an
optional mandate, voters in different parts of that single
district would be voting under different rules.
The LAO suggests that lawmakers either fund the mandates, if they
represent state priorities, or else repeal them, preserving
uniformity.
Property Taxes
SB 636 (Hill) – Support
As introduced February 22, 2013
CSAC supports SB 636, by Senator Jerry Hill, a bill that would
modify a provision included in last year’s redevelopment budget
trailer bill (AB 1484) relating to the allocation of property tax
revenues from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund
(RPTTF).
Among many other complex issues surrounding the dissolution of
redevelopment agencies is the redistribution of property taxes.
As successor agencies pay off their obligations, billions of
property tax dollars will return to counties, cities, special
districts, and of course school districts. No one disputes that
these property taxes should be returned exactly as they would
have been absent a redevelopment agency’s diversion of the tax
increment.
Unfortunately, one provision of the laws passed during the final
approval of the 2012-13 state budget inadvertently reduced
property tax allocations to local agencies in counties where ERAF
payments exceed the amount needed to fulfill school districts’
minimum funding requirements. This situation is known as “excess
ERAF,” and when it occurs, the ERAF payments are returned to
taxing entities in the proportion they were paid.
Removing this language will restore property tax allocations to
their rightful levels, ensuring fairness and equity for the few
counties affected and avoiding the legal and constitutional
challenges raised by this issue.
SB 636 is scheduled to be heard by the Senate Governance and
Finance Committee on April 3.