Government Finance and Operations 09/02/2011
Bankruptcy
AB 506 (Wieckowski) – Oppose
As Amended August 31, 2011
CSAC remains opposed to AB 506, by Assembly Member Bob
Wieckowski, a measure that counties will recall requires local
agencies to first participate in a “neutral evaluation” process
prior to seeking Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection. We anticipate
additional amendments to AB 506 to cross the desk today; these
amendments, however, do not substantively improve the bill.
CSAC and our local government partners continue to lobby the
state Senate and the Governor’s Office on the severe consequences
to local communities should AB 506 be enacted. We urge counties
to continue to communicate their concerns to their legislative
representatives. Check out the CSAC website for our letters.
Validations
SB 193 (Committee on Governance and Finance) – Support
Enrolled on September 1, 2011
SB 193, by the Senate Governance and Finance Committee, would
retroactively cure the minor errors and omissions that public
officials make throughout the year. In turn, this will give
investors confidence in public agencies’ securities and therefore
lead to lower interest rates for state and local bonds. They do
not correct fraud, corruption, or unconstitutional acts. These
“validating acts” are traditionally noncontroversial and receive
“aye” votes from all legislators, since with their passage
everyone wins.
However, when Senator Wolk presented the validating acts earlier
this year in the Assembly Local Government Committee, Vice Chair
Alejo asked for amendments to all three bills. Mr. Alejo said
that he was concerned about the actions taken by some
redevelopment agencies in reaction to the Governor’s proposal to
end redevelopment agencies. He worried that the validating acts
might be used inappropriately to attempt to protect questionable
asset transfers and interagency borrowing. Mr. Alejo’s amendments
removed redevelopment agencies from the bills’ protections. The
Assembly Local Government Committee adopted Mr. Alejo’s
amendments on a 7-0 vote. In reaction, the California
Redevelopment Agency and the League of California Cities withdrew
its earlier support for the three bills. Because of all of this,
the first validating act, SB 191, failed passage on the Assembly
Floor earlier this summer. SB 192, the second validating act, did
not come up for a vote since, as an urgency measure, it would
have required but been unable to obtain a two-thirds vote.
SB 193 is on its way to the Governor’s desk.
Telecommunications
SB 3 (Padilla) – Support
Enrolled on September 1, 2011
SB 3, by Senator Alex Padilla, would extend to 2015 authority for
the CPUC to use the California High-Cost Funds A and B to support
telephone and broadband services in high-cost service areas,
primarily rural, and to support small independent providers. It
would also explicitly require contributions to the fund from
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) revenues.
The high-cost funds, A and B, subsidize the cost of providing
telecommunication services to rural and hard-to-reach parts of
the state. They are funded with surcharges on all telephone bills
and help ensure that access to phone and broadband services are
universal, to everyone’s benefit. This ensures that residents of
rural counties and the hard-to-reach places in all counties have
affordable access to the telecommunications system that is so
important to our economy, our safety, and our daily lives.
SB 3 is on its way to the Governor’s desk.