Health and Human Services 04/19/2013
Rural Managed Care Expansion Postponed Until September 1
The Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) notified
stakeholders last week that the anticipated start date for the
rural managed care expansion has been moved from June 1 to
September 1, 2013. The later implementation date applies to all
28 counties in the proposed expansion.
As reported in March, DHCS had announced the selection of health
plans that will provide Medi-Cal Managed Care services to the
residents of 28 rural counties. Eight northern counties (see list
below) will offer Partnership Health Plan
of California, a County-Organized Health System (COHS) that
currently already serves Solano, Sonoma, Napa and Yolo Counties.
Eighteen other counties (see list below) will be covered by
Anthem Blue Cross and the California Health and Wellness Plan,
run by CSAC Corporate Partner Centene Corporation. San Benito
County will join the Central Alliance for
Health – which is another COHS already serving Merced,
Monterey, and Santa Cruz Counties – and the state is considering
allowing Imperial County to follow the Local Initiative model, in
which the county will develop partnerships with safety-net
providers, traditional Medi-Cal providers, and local communities.
The Imperial County decision is expected by June 1.
The expansion of Medi-Cal Managed Care to the 28 fee-for-service
rural counties was authorized last year via AB 1467 (Chapter
Number 23, Statutes of 2012). For a map of the counties and
plans, plus additional resources and information, please visit
the DHCS
Rural Expansion page.
Partnership Health Plan Counties: Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake,
Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, Siskiyou and Trinity.
Anthem Blue Cross Counties: Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras,
Colusa, El Dorado, Glenn, Inyo, Mariposa, Mono, Nevada, Placer,
Plumas, Sierra, Sutter, Tehama, Tuolumne and Yuba.
Human Services
AB 197 (Stone) – Support
As Introduced on January 29, 2013
AB 197, by Assembly Member Mark Stone, would allow California
Work Opportunities and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program
applicants and recipients to own reliable cars.
AB 197 would specifically delete the requirement that counties
assess the value of a motor vehicle when determining or
redetermining CalWORKs eligibility. AB 197 will decrease the
administrative workload required of counties to verify the value
of applicants’ vehicles. Counties also believe that the success
of CalWORKs participants is often dependent on reliable
transportation, along with key employment supports and
services.
AB 197 was heard by the Assembly Appropriations Committee on
April 17 and placed on that Committee’s Suspense File.
AB 260 (Gordon) – Support
As Introduced on February 7, 2013
AB 260, by Assembly Member Richard Gordon, would remove the
sunset date for the Child Care Subsidy Pilot projects in San
Francisco City and County and San Mateo County. The Assembly
Human Services Committee passed AB 260 on April 16, and it now
goes to the Assembly Appropriations Committee.
AB 720 (Skinner) – Support
As Proposed to Be Amended
AB 720, by Assembly Member Nancy Skinner, would help reduce
recidivism and assist counties in our responsibility for post
release community supervision of individuals in county jails by
enrolling them in the federally funded Medi-Cal program before
their release.
Assembly Bill 720 will give counties an important tool to reduce
repeat crime and recidivism by allowing newly released inmates to
access critical health care and substance use disorder services
through Medi-Cal, or, if they qualify, through a qualified health
plan in the state’s health benefits exchange. By pre-enrolling
incarcerated individuals, counties can get a jump on providing
wrap-around services to the most high-risk inmates to ensure
adequate supervision and successful and sustainable reentry in
our communities. Amendments will clarify that the county may
designate which agency and staff is assigned to the jail to make
eligibility determinations.
CSAC supports efforts to increase local flexibility and
innovation in serving the AB 109 and county jail population
because the benefits of successful reintegration of incarcerated
individuals accrue to a variety of stakeholders, including
counties, the state, our local communities and families. It is
for these reasons that CSAC supports AB 720 as proposed to be
amended. The author is working with the California State Sheriffs
Association on timing issues within the bill, and the County
Welfare Directors Association on eligibility methods issues. The
measure was passed by the Assembly Public Safety Committee on
April 16 and next goes to the Assembly Appropriations Committee.
Public Health
AB 506 (Mitchell) – Support
As Introduced on February 20, 2013
AB 506, by Assembly Member Holly Mitchell, would authorize social
workers and health care providers to consent to an HIV test for a
child under the age of one year who is in temporary custody or is
a dependent child of the court. The measure is sponsored by Los
Angeles County and may be amended to clarify issues raised during
this week’s Assembly Human Services Committee hearing. The
measure was passed by that Committee and will be heard next in
the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
Mental Health
SB 664 (Yee) – Oppose Unless Amended
As Amended on April 11, 2013
SB 664, by Senator Leland Yee, would remove the authority of
county Boards of Supervisors to determine whether the
implementation of Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) services,
commonly known as Laura’s Law, is appropriate in their
communities. The measure had also sought to clarify that Mental
Health Services Act funds may be used for AOT services in those
counties that have authorized implementation. However, this
provision, which CSAC supported, was amended out of the measure
on April 11.
As amended, the measure removes the authority of county Boards of
Supervisors to choose to implement Laura’s Law. However, the
Laura’s Law demonstration project was specifically constructed to
allow county Boards of Supervisors to consider the needs and
priorities of their local communities, as well as the fiscal
ramifications, of implementing AOT services. It is critical that
county Boards of Supervisors retain the authority and flexibility
to determine whether implementing Laura’s Law AOT services in
their communities is appropriate.
It is for these reasons that CSAC had taken an Oppose Unless
Amended position on SB 664. With the new amendments, CSAC may
change to a straight Oppose position. The Senate Health Committee
will hear SB 664 on April 24.
Medical Care
AB 361 (Mitchell) – Support
As Amended on April 4 , 2013
AB 361, by Assembly Member Holly Mitchell, would allow the state
and counties to work together to leverage significant federal
funding and create a patient-centered “health home” program for
Medi-Cal beneficiaries who are frequent hospital users.
Specifically, the measure would allow California to utilize a 90
percent federal funding match for two years under the Affordable
Care Act to create a comprehensive program for frequent hospital
users. The funding can be used to implement comprehensive
engagement and case management services to high-risk populations
and will help promote an integrated approach (“health home”) to
health care and wellbeing for the most chronically ill people in
our communities. The program goal is to stabilize – and even
increase – the health of frequent hospital users while reducing
their utilization of costly medical care.
Currently, a dozen counties fund or manage health home integrated
programs for frequent hospital users, and have realized medical
cost savings as a result. Further, Assembly Member Mitchell has
secured private funding from the California Endowment for the
non-federal costs associated with the first two years of the
program. Counties, many of which are working to implement the
integrated health model, welcome an opportunity to opt into the
health home services funding offered through the Affordable Care
Act. We believe counties and the state can achieve significant
cost savings for the sickest and most expensive users of hospital
care – all without incurring state costs for erecting a health
home program.
For these reasons, CSAC supports AB 361. The Assembly
Appropriations Committee heard the measure on April 17 and placed
it on their Suspense File.
AB 900 (Alejo) – Support
As Introduced February 22, 2013
AB 900, by Assembly Member Luis Alejo, would restore significant
cuts to the reimbursement rate for Medi-Cal services provided by
distinct part skilled nursing facilities (DP/SNFs). These
significant rate cuts were passed in 2011at the height of the
Great Recession and during a time when California’s legislators
were grappling with a $25 billion budget deficit. Compounding the
devastating effects of the cuts is the fact that DP/SNFs must
retroactively reimburse the state for more than two years of the
rates paid to them before the cuts were declared legal.
Many small urban and rural hospitals with skilled nursing
facilities cannot pay the large retroactive amounts due for the
rate cuts, which run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Further, many individual facilities cannot absorb the rate cut
for this fiscal year, as health care costs have continued to
rise. These small facilities are struggling financially, and
their ability to continue to provide medically necessary services
in communities throughout the state hangs in the
balance.
This is why CSAC has joined with hospital representatives, county
affiliates, health advocates and legislators from both sides of
the aisle to support the elimination of the AB 97 rate cuts to
distinct part skilled nursing facilities and the retroactive
payments associated with those cuts. AB 900 will allow these
facilities to continue to provide critical post-hospital care.
The Assembly Health Committee will hear AB 900 on April 30.