Housing, Land Use and Transportation 08/12/2011
Public Works Administration
SB 293 (Padilla) – Oppose
As Amended on July 5, 2011
SB 293, by Senator Alex Padilla, would cap retention on a public
works project at five percent. Current law requires retentions of
at least five percent on public works projects, with the
flexibility for public agencies to utilize the most appropriate
retention, case-by-case, to protect taxpayers, ratepayers and
Californians who depend upon core local services.
A five percent retention cap imposes a one-size-fits-all policy
and removes flexibility to appropriately manage risk on a
project-by-project basis. Local agencies must accept the lowest
responsible bidder when awarding contracts. The flexibility
provided in existing law allows agencies to do a project risk
assessment and determine retention provisions that are
appropriate to the level of risk assessed for a project.
Prohibiting retention over 5% is bad policy at the worst possible
time. During this difficult economic and budgetary time, public
agencies, taxpayers and ratepayers cannot afford failures on the
part of contractors. Furthermore, in this climate, contractors
faced with difficult financial decisions are more likely to
abandon a project when he or she deems the remaining work to be
unprofitable.
Supporters assert that this bill is in response to the downturn
in the economy; however, this is the eighth attempt to enact this
legislative proposal, the first of which dates back to 1996. We
do not believe that this legislation is in response to the hard
economic times, rather a solution in search of a problem.
Furthermore, local agencies have been equally hurt from the
downturn in the economy, slashing budgets and staff, and
operating in extremely fiscally constrained environments.
Existing law affords contractors an interest-bearing escrow
account for all retention proceeds. Current law provides
contractors the ability to establish escrow accounts that allow
retention proceeds to gain interest payments for the contractor
while providing adequate assurance to the public agency that the
project will be completed. Additionally, local agencies commonly
reduce retention to 5% at the half-way point of project
completion, if adequate progress is being made and the contractor
is acting in good faith. SB 293 would thwart the ability of local
agencies to properly ensure projects are completed.
SB 293 is set for hearing before the Assembly Appropriations
Committee on August 17.
Transportation
AB 345 (Atkins) – Support
As Amended on June 29, 2011
AB 345, by Assembly Member Toni Atkins, would codify in statute a
long-standing advisory committee, the California Uniform Traffic
Control Devices Committee (CTCDC), created by the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The measure would also
add two additional representatives to the CTCDC representing
non-motorized users of the road, selected from the Caltrans
Active Transportation and Livable Communities Advisory Group
(ATLC).
CSAC, with two representatives on the CTCDC since 1968, is an
active participant working to ensure local government input into
Caltrans decisions’ regarding rules and regulations prescribing
uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic
control devices in California. Counties serve an important role
on this committee as we are subject to and oversee implementation
of changes to standards resulting from developing science and new
technology. We remain important governmental partners as owners
and operators of 38 percent of the state’s road
mileage.
CSAC supports the goals of AB 345 – to expand the membership on
the CTCDC to ensure that all users of the roadway system impacted
by decisions regarding traffic control device standards are
represented. We believe the ATLC Advisory Group is a good
resource from which to appoint the non-motorized representatives
to the CTCDC.
AB 345 is scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Appropriations
Committee on August 15.
AB 650 (Blumenfield) – Support
As Amended on June 29, 2011
AB 650, by Assembly Member Bob Blumenfield, would create, until
March 30, 2013, the Blue Ribbon Task Force (Task Force) on Public
Transportation for the 21st Century. The Task Force, a 12-member
body appointed by the Senate Rules Committee and the Speaker of
the Assembly, would be required to submit a written report to the
Governor and Legislature by September 30, 2012 that shall
include, among other things, specific findings and
recommendations relating to the current state of California’s
transit system, the level and types of transit needed to meet
economic, equity, public health, and sustainability goals, the
estimated cost of creating the needed transit systems, potential
funding sources, and recommendations for future actions resulting
from these findings.
AB 650 will provide valuable information and data to the
Legislature and Governor regarding the current cost and demand
for public transportation, including how to pay for it. Without
this information, it will remain difficult for policy- and
decision-makers to make vital funding decisions and support
public transportation in the state. For these reasons, CSAC
supports AB 650.
AB 650 is set for a hearing before the Senate Appropriations
Committee on August 15.
AB 892 (Carter) – Support
As Amended on July 13, 2011
AB 892, by Assembly Member Wilmer Amina Carter, would extend the
State of California’s existing limited waiver of its sovereign
immunity, which is necessary to allow the California Department
of Transportation (Caltrans) to continue its assumptions of
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) responsibilities under
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act:
A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Specifically, the measure
extends the limited waiver of sovereign immunity until January 1,
2017, or until a termination of the Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) between the California Department of Transportation and the
Federal Highway Administration.
Caltrans has been participating in the “Surface Transportation
Project Delivery Pilot Program” (Pilot Program) under a MOU since
July 1, 2007. To assume these federal responsibilities, Caltrans
was required to accept the jurisdiction of the federal courts,
necessitating the limited waiver of sovereign immunity.
The Pilot Program is intended to streamline the process for
approving transportation projects by allowing Caltrans to assume
FHWA’s responsibility for approvals and consultations under NEPA
and other federal laws while maintaining all federal
environmental protections. The program requires Caltrans to
comply with all FHWA NEPA regulations, environmental policies and
formal guidance. Under the program, one layer of bureaucracy,
related to FHWA’s review of environmental documents, is removed,
decreasing the time required for environmental
approvals.
Based on the first 3.5 years of the Pilot Program, Caltrans has
achieved a median time savings of 14 months in preparing and
approving routine environmental documents, measured from when
environmental studies begin until the final environmental
document is signed. These time savings are based on almost 70
projects for which Caltrans independently made environmental
approvals for both the draft and final environmental document
under the Pilot Program.
This legislation is a key element in helping Caltrans streamline
the environmental review process for critical transportation
projects. For these reasons, CSAC supports AB 892.
AB 892 is set for a hearing before the Senate Appropriations
Committee on August 15.
Indian Gaming
AB 1417 (Hall) – Support
As Amended on June 22, 2011
AB 1417, by Assembly Member Isadore Hall, would appropriate $18.2
million from the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund (SDF)
for grants to local governments to help off-set the impacts on
infrastructure and public services from tribal gaming.
While the grants offered via the SDF program do not mitigate all
of the affects Indian gaming has on California’s local
communities, the funding is still very critical to local
jurisdictions affected by gaming. Counties experience a myriad of
costly impacts on local infrastructure and services ranging from
transportation to wastewater to public safety.
Additionally, these are special funds and have no impact of the
State’s General Fund or budget. This appropriation will help
local governments and Tribes put this dedicated revenue towards
its intended purpose. These funds are even more vital during such
difficult budget and economic times and could even stimulate some
economic activity as a result of investing the money in
infrastructure mitigation projects.
AB 1417 is scheduled for a hearing before the Senate
Appropriations Committee on August 15.