Housing, Land Use and Transportation
Land Use/Planning
AB 402 (Dodd) – Request for Comment
As introduced on February 19, 2015
Assembly Bill 402, by Assembly Member Bill Dodd, would allow a
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to authorize a city or
special district to provide services outside its boundaries and
Spheres of Influence (SOI) to serve existing or planned uses,
subject to approval at publically noticed hearing where the
commission makes specified determinations, including that such
services will not adversely impact agriculture or open
space.
AB 402 has been referred to the Assembly Local Government
Committee.
AB 451 (Bonilla) – Support
As introduced on February 23, 2015
Assembly Bill 451, by Assembly Member Susan Bonilla, would
clarify cities’ and counties’ authority to enact ordinances to
allow the owners or operators of a privately owned and maintained
off-street parking facility to regulate unauthorized parking in
that facility. CSAC supports this measure because it would ensure
that local governments are able to authorize private parking lot
operators to regulate private lots and enforce parking violations
through the use of invoices. The bill ensures consumer
protections by preventing private parking operators from
transmitting information to the Department of Motor Vehicles for
the purpose of a “hold” on issuing or renewing a license or
refusing to renew a vehicle registration. Moreover, cities and
counties ensure fairness by imposing requirements that specify
signage, penalty amounts and dispute resolution procedures.
AB 451 will be heard in the Assembly Local Government Committee
on Wednesday, April 8.
AB 514 (Williams) – Request for Comment
As introduced on February 23, 2015
Assembly Bill 514, by Assembly Member Das Williams, would provide
that a city or county could impose fines for violators of land
use codes who did not obtain a permanent that are proportional to
the magnitude of the violation. The bill would still retain the
current maximum penalty amounts in statute but provide local
agencies the discretion to impose appropriate fines within those
bounds to deter land use violations.
AB 1236 (Chiu) – Request for Comment
As introduced on February 27, 2015
Assembly Bill 1236, by Assembly Member David Chiu, would require
a city or county to approve the installation of electric vehicle
charging stations unless the city or county can make findings
based upon substantial evidence in the record that the proposed
installation would have adverse impacts on public health or
safety and there is no feasible method to mitigate or avoid these
impacts.
Transportation
AB 323 (Olsen) – Support
As introduced on February 13, 2015
Assembly Bill 323, by Assembly Minority Leader Olsen, would
indefinitely extend the provisions of AB 890 (Olsen, 2012) which
allow a city or county with less than 100,000 population to
exempt from CEQA review a project to repair, maintain, or make
minor alterations to an existing roadway for public safety
purposes. CSAC supported AB 890, and will support the removal of
the current sunset date.
AB 323 was passed by the Assembly Natural Resources Committee by
a unanimous vote on Monday, March 23.
Public Works Administration
AB 1347 (Chiu) – Oppose
As introduced on February 27, 2015
Assembly Bill 1347, by Assembly Member David Chiu, would
establish a new “claim resolution process” for public entity
contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2016. Specifically,
AB 1347 would:
- Authorize contractors to submit a written demand or assertion by certified mail to a public entity to make a variety of requests/demands related to public contracts. The bill would define a written demand or assertion as “including a request for a modification, contract amendment, or change order, seeking an adjustment or interpretation of the terms of the contract documents, payment of money, extension of time, or other relief, including a determination of disputes or matters arising out of, or related to, the contract documents or the performance of work on a public work”;
- Require the public entity to review and provide a written response to the contractor within 30 days addressing what parts of the claim are disputed and what parts are undisputed;
- Require any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim to be processed and made within 7 days after the public entity issues its written response;
- Deem a claim approved in its entirety if a public entity fails to respond to a contractor;
- Require nonbinding mediation for any disputed portion of the claim. The public entity and contractor shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing; and
- Apply an interest rate of 10% to amounts not paid in a timely manner.
- Exempt claims made pursuant to this legislation from the False Claims Act.
CSAC opposes the overly-broad and prescriptive nature of this
measure. We also find that the law is redundant, given that
dispute resolution procedures are incorporated into public works
contracts. AB 1347 has been referred to the Assembly Committee on
Accountability and Administrative Review.
SB 119 (Hill) – Request for Comment
As introduced on January 14, 2015
Senate Bill 119, by Senator Jerry Hill, would make substantial
changes to the statutes governing excavation near subsurface
installations. This legislation is important to counties, as they
are often both excavators as well as the owners of underground
installations that may need to be marked when excavation will
occur. The bill’s key provisions would:
- Require the Contractor’s State License Board to adopt a program to enforce violations of excavation provisions by authorizing the board to require a contractor to undergo training, levy a fine, and suspend licenses for violations;
- Clarify and revise provisions related to excavation notification;
- Change the definition of a subsurface installation to an underground or submerged duct, pipeline, or structure, thereby extending notification/marking requirements to storm drains and non-pressurized sewer lines and other drains;
- Delete the existing exemption for Caltrans’ participation in the notification/marking requirements;
- Require owners of subsurface installations to maintain and preserve all plans as records for any subsurface installation as that information becomes known;
- Limit the existing exemption for real property owners to only residential property owners using only hand tools;
- Prohibit excavators from being held liable for damages to an installation due to inaccurate marking, provided that the excavator follows the provisions of the law;
- Award attorney’s fees to excavators sued by subsurface installation owners if the court/arbitrator finds that the excavator complied with the law;
- Require the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to revise and publish standards to clarify excavation best practices by 2017 and convene an advisory committee hearing;
- Create the California Underground Utilities Facilities Safe Excavation Authority to enforce laws relating to the protection of underground infrastructure through civil penalties; and
- Allow the Public Utilities Commission and State Fire Marshall to enforce the requirement to locate and mark subsurface installations operated by utilities, unless they are municipal utilities.
CSAC has already heard from several counties with concerns, but given the bill’s broad scope we would like to hear from as many counties as possible as to the potential impacts of this legislation. SB 119 is set for hearing on April 6 in the Senate Business, Professions, and Economic Development Committee.