The California Supreme Court will decide what standard of judicial review applies to a facial constitutional challenge to inclusionary housing ordinances that require set asides or in-lieu fees as a condition of approving a development permit.  CSAC has filed a brief in support of the City of San Jose arguing that the most deferential standard applies to courts’ review of inclusionary zoning ordinances.  CSAC’s brief was drafted by Thomas Brown at Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP in Oakland.