This case arises under the Housing Accountability Act’s requirement that a project is “deemed consistent” with objective standards if there is substantial evidence that would allow a reasonable person to conclude that the project is consistent, regardless of what the local agency governing board decides.  CSAC’s brief argues that the provision has no bearing on a local agency’s interpretation of its own enactments. The brief also explains what an objective standard is for purposes of the statute, and raising some constitutional concerns with the statutory provision. CSAC’s brief was drafted by RCRC’s General Counsel Arthur Wylene.