Claremont Canyon Conservancy v. Regents of the University of California (A165012)
The case discusses the specificity required by CEQA in regulatory programs, such as a fire mitigation program. CSAC’s brief, prepared by R. Tyson Sohagi at The Sohagi Law Group in Los Angeles, explains why CEQA gives local agencies project description flexibility and urges the court not to rely on an early case requiring too much specificity in a project description too early in the process (Stopthemillenniumhollywood.com v. City of Los Angeles).
